From years of experience teaching physiology to graduate students, I found students learn best when they have a good grasp of basic concepts and mechanisms. As we are well aware, the lecture format was used to disseminate knowledge on various topics. Students took notes and were expected to reinforce their knowledge by reading recommended texts and solving related questions that were assigned. Some courses had accompanying laboratories and discussion sessions where students learned about applications and gained practical experience. The term “active learning” was not in vogue, even though it was taking place in a variety of ways! Successful teachers realized that when students were able to identify the learning issues and followed through by searching for what they needed to understand, this process enhanced learning. The idea of a “flipped” classroom had not been described as such, but was occurring de facto in rudimentary ways with the ancillary activities that were associated with some courses. As you are reading this, you are incorrect if you think it is an appeal to go back to the way things were.
By coincidence, one evening after work, I was listening to the radio about the story of a professor at an elite college. My colleagues and I had just been discussing new teaching ideas and technologies! As an acclaimed and accomplished educator he was surprised to learn that his students did not do as well as he expected on a national exam in comparison to other students being tested on the same subject. I was mesmerized and had to stop and listen to this teacher’s thoughts about how he changed his methods to improve student learning and their ability to apply knowledge. This is also when I heard the expression, “if it was good enough for Galileo, it is good enough for me.” This humorously illustrates an extreme case of someone who doesn’t want to incorporate new ideas, different knowledge and new developments. As you are reading this, you are incorrect if you think it is an appeal to go back to the way things were. Obviously, we can and do find new ways to teach, but this doesn’t mean abandoning methods that work. In listening to debates on topics such as integrating the curriculum, we acknowledge that other systems also work if used properly. However, they should be well thought-out and appropriate for the group of students you are teaching. So, how does this apply to teaching graduate physiology to today’s students?
Creative teachers have always found a way to engage their students. From what I have come to understand, today’s students seem to prefer a classroom environment that combines lectures with some form of a multimedia presentation and exercises such as team-based learning, where they can interact with fellow students and instructors. This keeps their attention and works well with students who grew up with technology. While technology also makes it easier for instructors to make slides and use multimedia, care must be taken to avoid oversimplifying. A tendency of modern media is to compress information into sound-bytes and that is a dangerous mindset for a graduate level course.
Instead of just acquiring knowledge for its own sake, today’s students want to learn what is relevant for their future endeavors. In my opinion, it is very important to show them how and why what they are learning relates to practical “real world” applications. I like to develop concepts, discuss mechanisms whenever possible, and show examples of how the knowledge is applied and useful. A plus is that these students like to work cooperatively and enjoy problem solving as a group exercise with a common goal in mind. However, in-class activities sometimes become too social and groups have to be kept on track. Another pitfall stems from the fact that in many courses, lectures are recorded and notes are distributed in the form of a syllabus that student’s rely on as their sole source of material. Too often, students copiously read the prepared notes and listen to the recorded lectures instead of more actively reviewing and connecting with the material that was presented.
The internet is a useful resource where information can easily be looked up. While this is helpful, I find that they may miss the larger context even though it was presented in class. This is where another comprehensive source of information such as a textbook (on-line or in print) can be used to reiterate material and reinforce what was discussed in class. Students would benefit more by using other resources to accompany notes and lectures. The “flipped” classroom works well if students come to class having prepared by reading, reviewing and analyzing the subject matter. This type of preparation also makes lectures more interactive and enjoyable by fostering class discussion. Therefore, I would conclude by stating it is the preparation by student and teacher that makes even the traditional lecture format more engaging and effective.